Author: David Bandurski

Now Executive Director of the China Media Project, leading the project’s research and partnerships, David originally joined the project in Hong Kong in 2004. He is the author of Dragons in Diamond Village (Penguin), a book of reportage about urbanization and social activism in China, and co-editor of Investigative Journalism in China (HKU Press).

Wang Lijun and the Tieling corruption case

The unofficial visit to the U.S. consulate in Chengdu last week of Chongqing’s former top cop and anti-vice crusader Wang Lijun (王立军) is now news reported the world round. The story, which first boiled up on the internet — with Chinese social media users posting on February 6, for example, that police had encircled the U.S. consulate — has been confirmed by both the United States and China.
Questions still abound, however, about what exactly the Wang Lijun incident means. Does it mark a dramatic change in the political fortunes of the charismatic “princeling” Bo Xilai (薄熙来), who has been tipped as a favorite to enter the Chinese Communist Party’s powerful politburo standing committee in a crucial leadership transition later this year?
Some observers have suggested that Wang Lijun’s visit to Chengdu was not in fact an attempted defection, as has been reported, but rather a leap to remove himself from the clutches of Bo Xilai, who had (it is rumored) already arrested people close to Wang.
Speculation goes further in suggesting that Wang Lijun might have cut a deal with discipline inspectors in Beijing, offering information damaging to Bo Xilai in exchange for leniency in treating Wang’s own alleged involvement in the Tieling case, a corruption scandal in northeastern Liaoning province that is reportedly still under investigation. [For a good round-up of various views on the Wang Lijun case and its significance, readers may want to turn to this piece at China Digital Times.]
Interestingly, and perhaps significantly, all news coverage mentioning Wang Lijun inside China today concerns the Tieling corruption case, about which precious little is so far known.
Wang Lijun is mentioned only to provide context to the confirmation that Gu Fengjie (谷凤杰), his successor as police chief in Tieling, has indeed been detained for alleged corruption — something long rumored but not, apparently, confirmed.
Aside from raising questions again about Wang Lijun’s possible exposure to a corruption investigation stemming from his time as police chief in Tieling, the news about Gu Fengjie’s case suggest to us that Chinese reporters are sniffing around the Wang Lijun case.
According to the WiseNews database of Chinese newspapers, there are five reports today confirming that the public security chief of Liaoning’s Tieling City, Gu Fengjie (谷凤杰), has been detained pending investigation for corruption (双规) since May last year. In fact, the reports are all drawn from Shanghai’s Oriental Morning Post newspaper, which ran the news yesterday, as follows (excerpted from a much longer report):

A relevant person in charge at the political and propaganda office of the Tieling Municipal Public Security Bureau confirmed to the reporter on February 12 that Gu Fengjie was detained pending investigation in May last year, adding: “But as to specifically what day it was I cannot recall.” A relevant employee at the Tieling Municipal Information Office also confirmed this news to the reporter.

The English-language Shanghai Daily also ran a news brief yesterday on its mobile service based on the Oriental Morning Post report:

The former vice mayor and police chief of Tieling City in northeast Liaoning Province has been sacked and disciplinary authorities are probing his official corruption, the Oriental Morning Post reported today.
Tieling City spokesman said Gu Fengjie, 58, has been under investigation by Liaoning Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection since May 2011 and his case has been handed over to the judicial department. But the spokesman gave no details of Gu’s criminal activities.
Gu was appointed as the director of Tieling City Public Security Bureau in 2003 and was promoted as the city’s vice mayor in 2004. He held both positions until May 2011.
It was widely gossiped that Gu was already serving a 12-year prison sentence for taking bribes and possessing a large amount of properties. But the spokesman said he heard no such information.

Coverage of Gu Fengjie like the above made a number of websites yesterday and today, but fewer sites used the full report from the Oriental Morning Post, which mentions twice (but does not directly implicate) Wang Lijun.
Here, for example, is a partial translation of coverage in today’s Shenzhen Commercial News:

According to a report in the Oriental Morning Post, since May last year the [unconfirmed] information that the former deputy mayor of Tieling City in Liaoning province, [concurrently the city’s] chief of public security, Gu Fengjie, has been detained pending investigation for corruption by the Liaoning provincial committee [of the CCP] and the [Liaoning provincial] discipline inspection office, has flown about on the internet.
Recently, a post online suggest further that on January 31 this year Gu Fengjie was sentenced to 12 years in prison by the Yuhong District Court (于洪区法院) in the city of Shenyang on the charge of bribery and possession of huge unaccountable assets.
A relevant person in charge at the political and propaganda office of the Tieling Municipal Public Security Bureau confirmed to the reporter on February 12 that Gu Fengjie was detained pending investigation in May last year, adding: “But as to specifically what day it was I cannot recall.” A relevant employee at the Tieling Municipal Information Office also confirmed this news to the reporter.
However, personnel with the political and propaganda office of the Tieling Municipal Public Security Bureau and the information office said they had no further information concerning the specific reasons for Gu Fengjie’s detention pending investigation (双规), and they said they had no information about whether or not Gu Fengjie had already been sentenced. “We have had no information since the case went into judicial proceedings,” [they said].

In explaining the context of the Gu Fengjie case, the report later goes on to say:

In July 2003, Gu Fengjie was transferred to Tieling from the administrative commission of the economic develop zone in Fushun, and was appointed as chief of the public security bureau and Party secretary of the bureau’s CCP committee. His predecessor [in the post] was Wang Lijun (王立军).

Certainly, that’s not much to go on. But we’ll have to watch and see whether Chinese reporters are able to tug at the rough edges of the Wang Lijun case and the Tieling connection.

Bo Xilai under great strain

The following post by Chinese lawyer Yuan Yulai (袁裕来) was deleted from Sina Weibo sometime after 8pm Hong Kong time, February 13, 2012. Yuan’s post was in fact a re-post of another by user, Yudao’s Little Nest (@余导的小窝), which shared a link (still available) to a song about Chongqing’s top leader, Bo Xilai (薄熙来). Yuan Yulai currently has more than 55,000 followers, according to numbers from Sina Weibo. [More on deleted posts at the WeiboScope Search, by the Journalism and Media Studies Centre].

It seems there is also a song praising “Bo Xilai” called “The Song of Bo Xilai.” http://t.cn/zOwV7pj

The above post was made in response to a second deleted post by veteran journalist and CMP fellow Yang Haipeng (杨海鹏), who included a picture of six skyscrapers in Chongqing, each topped with a Chinese character (presumably Photoshopped). Yang wrote: “In Chongqing, six skyscrapers, each topped with a character, together reading: ‘Bo Xilai is under great strain.”


The original Chinese-language re-post by Yuan Yulai follows:

好像还有一首歌颂“薄熙来”的歌曲《薄熙来之歌》。http://t.cn/zOwV7pj


NOTE: All posts to The Anti-Social List are listed as “permission denied” in the Sina Weibo API, which means they were deleted by Weibo managers, not by users themselves.

Kicking Out Western Dramas


China’s State Administration of Radio Film and Television, the government agency charged with controlling and regulating China’s television and film industries, released a notice in February 2012 saying that overseas produced television drama series could not be broadcast during prime time (7pm to 10pm). The notice also said that foreign television dramas could not account for more than 25 percent of dramas broadcast during any given day. In the following cartoon, posted by artist Shang Haichun (商海春) to his blog at QQ.com, an angry television set labelled “prime time” (黄金时段) boots out a blond haired Westerner. The label tossed to the ground beside the Westerner reads “Western dramas.”

Xi Jinping to receive photos of father during U.S. visit

The following post by Wall Street Journal Chinese (华尔街日报中文网) was deleted from Sina Weibo sometime after 10:03pm Hong Kong time yesterday, February 12, 2012. Wall Street Journal Chinese currently has just under 744,000 followers, according to numbers from Sina Weibo. [More on deleted posts at the WeiboScope Search, by the Journalism and Media Studies Centre].

[Xi Jinping will receive photo album of Xi Zhongxun during U.S. visit] Next week when Chinese Vice-President Xi Jinping (习近平) will visit Washington, DC, he will be gifted with an album of photographs including some of his father Xi Zhongxun’s (习仲勋) visit to the U.S. 32 years ago. http://t.cn/zOzIM3B

The post was accompanied with a link to the Chinese-language article at the Wall Street Journal’s China Realtime Report. The English-language version of that article is available here.
The original Chinese-language post follows:

【习近平将收到习仲勋访美相册】- 中国国家副主席习近平下周访问华盛顿时将获赠一本相册,其中收录了其父习仲勋32年前访美时的一组珍贵照片。http://t.cn/zOzIM3B


NOTE: All posts to The Anti-Social List are listed as “permission denied” in the Sina Weibo API, which means they were deleted by Weibo managers, not by users themselves.

Heavy police presence in Tibetan Sichuan

The following post by CMP researcher David Bandurski (班志远) was deleted from Sina Weibo sometime after 12:09pmam Hong Kong time today, Febuary 13, 2012. David Bandurski currently has more than 3,000 followers on Weibo. [More on deleted posts at the WeiboScope Search, by the Journalism and Media Studies Centre].

A reporter from The Guardian secretly entered the Tibetan plateau to film. Approaching [the city of] Aba, there were paramilitary units set up every 20 meters or so. In the Tibetan quarter of Aba, there were police cars stopped along the streets every few dozen meters. http://t.cn/zOAG4tG.

The post was accompanied with the following screenshot of Jonathan Watts’ story from The Guardian on his reporting trip into Aba, Sichuan:


Bandurski’s original Chinese-language post follows:

《卫报》记者偷偷的进入西藏高原拍摄. 靠近阿坝, 整条路的每20米都有辅助正规军. 阿坝藏族区每一条小路每十几米都停了警车. http://t.cn/zOAG4tG


NOTE: All posts to The Anti-Social List are listed as “permission denied” in the Sina Weibo API, which means they were deleted by Weibo managers, not by users themselves.

The Secret Game Rules


Yu Zhiping (余治平), a member of the Party standing committee and a deputy mayor in Meishan, Sichuan province, who was removed from his post back in 2009 for taking bribes totaling 3.38 million yuan, is reported to have said in a written repentance (悔过书) that he had often told himself that “there are no fish when the water is clean.” This story was re-run by China’s Procuratorate Daily in February 2012, and was picked up by a number of Chinese websites. In this cartoon, posted by artist Chen Chunming (陈春鸣) to his blog at QQ.com

Wang Lijun in China's news pages

Speculation over the Wang Lijun (王立军) case continues to fly across Chinese domestic social media today. Users of every description, including prominent journalists and academics, are sharing purported inside information — the possible involvement, for example, of a wealthy Chongqing businessmen who has now, some suggest, fled overseas.
Foreign media reports are being actively shared on social media like Sina Weibo and QQ Weibo, some with screenshot images that might stand a better chance of eluding censors. For example, many versions of a bilingual transcript of questions answered on Wang Lijun by US state department spokesperson Victoria Nuland, who said, for example: “Wang Lijun did request a meeting at the US consulate general in Chengdu earlier this week . . . He did visit the consulate and he later left the consulate of his own volition.”
In stark contrast to Chinese social media, where as of Friday afternoon the keyword “Wang Lijun” remained unblocked, Chinese traditional media have been on lockdown.
According to the WiseNews database of Chinese newspapers, 37 articles on the Wang Lijun case appear in China’s press today — all of these, without a single exception, are verbatim versions of the official news release issued by Xinhua News Agency, which reads:

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesman Answers Questions on the Wang Lijun Incident
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, February 9 — The spokesperson office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in response to questions on the 9th that Chongqing Vice-Mayor Wang Lijun entered the U.S. Consulate in Chengdu on February 6, and left after remaining there for one day. Relevant departments are now investigating this [matter].

The uniformity of today’s coverage of the China certainly suggests there has been a directive from the Central Propaganda Department instructing media to use only information from Xinhua (and perhaps the People’s Daily).
But how have papers dealt with the niggardly material available from Xinhua?
Newspapers, both Party and commercial, from different regions actually used the Xinhua release in slightly different ways. Many put the news deep in inside pages, giving it very subdued treatment. But 8 of the 37 newspapers actually did put the story on page 1. Three of these were commercial spin-offs of local Party newspapers, four were local Party newspapers, and the last, China Economic Times, is a paper published by the Development Research Center under China’s State Council:

Changjiang Daily (长江日报)
First Financial Daily (第一财经日报)
Lanzhou Morning Post (兰州晨报)
Beijing Morning Post (北京晨报)
Shantou Daily (汕头日报)
Qingdao Daily (青岛日报)
Jinan Daily (济南日报)
China Economic Times (中国经济时报)

The Lanzhou Morning Post put the Wang Lijun story in a box to the right-hand side of the page, just to the right of a photograph of a girl playing in the snow.


[ABOVE: The Xinhua release on Wang Lijun makes the front page of the February 10, 2012, edition of the Lanzhou Morning Post.]
The Beijing Morning Post, a commercial spin-off of the city’s official Beijing Daily, ran the story in a box under the main photograph, of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper on a visit to China.

[ABOVE: The Xinhua release on Wang Lijun makes the front page of the February 10, 2012, edition of the Beijing Morning Post.]
Qingdao Daily, the official Party mouthpiece of the Qingdao leadership, gave the story a tiny box at the very bottom of its front page, like the other pages above with no accompanying photo.

[ABOVE: The Xinhua release on Wang Lijun makes the front page of the February 10, 2012, edition of Qingdao Daily.]
But Qingdao Daily‘s commercial spin-off, Qingdao Morning News also ran the story on the front page, this time with a photo of Wang Lijun. It should be noted that the Qingdao Morning News front-page article does not appear in the WiseNews database, so there may be other newspapers as well that ran the story but are not shown here.

[ABOVE: The Xinhua release on Wang Lijun makes the front page of the February 10, 2012, edition of Qingdao Morning News, with a photo of Wang Lijun (at bottom).]
Guangzhou’s commercial New Express newspaper made no mention of the story on its front page, but did give it relatively prominent play on page 31, the China current affairs section.
The bold headline at the New Express reads: “Chongqing Deputy Mayor Wang Lijun Spent One Day in the American Consulate.” The subhead below adds: “Ministry of Foreign Affairs Says Relevant Departments are Investigating This.” To the right is the full Xinhua News Agency release.

[ABOVE: The Xinhua release on Wang Lijun makes page 31 of the February 10, 2012, edition of the New Express.]
The Today Morning Express, a commercial spin-off of the official provincial Zhejiang Daily, also put the story at the top of its national news section on page 11, with similar treatment. The paper sticks to the Xinhua News Agency release, but plays up the news as much as it can, with a bold headline and the release content set off with a shadow box.

[ABOVE: The Xinhua release on Wang Lijun makes page 11 of the February 10, 2012, edition of Today Morning Express.]

Wang Lijun case connected to businessman who fled?

The following post by veteran investigative reporter and CMP fellow Yang Haipeng (杨海鹏) was deleted from Sina Weibo sometime after 7am Hong Kong time today, Febuary 10, 2012. Yang Haipeng currently has more than 169,000 followers on Weibo. [More on deleted posts at the WeiboScope Search, by the Journalism and Media Studies Centre].

It is said that this cataclysm in Chongqing has to do with a wealthy and influential businessman, Li Junyi (李俊亦), who fled [the country]. Li had [a fortune of] several billion in assets, all taken [seized?], and before he was taken [arrested] he fled on a plane from Chengdu. After this, when Li was overseas, he informed about some secrets (阴事) concerning the anti-vice [campaign in Chongqing]. Some inside stories about Chongqing have also been put in the hands of senior leaders. Li has connections with the Chengdu military district and is an above-board businessman (合法商人).

Yang Haipeng’s original Chinese-language post follows:

据说,此次重庆骤变,与一个落跑富豪李俊亦有关。李拥有数十亿资产,均被充没,在抓捕前,从成都坐飞机逃亡。后,李氏在海外举报打黑阴事,一些重庆内情也为高层掌握。李与成都军区有关,合法商人


NOTE: All posts to The Anti-Social List are listed as “permission denied” in the Sina Weibo API, which means they were deleted by Weibo managers, not by users themselves.

Post of Hong Kong coverage of Wang Lijun case

The following post by CMP researcher David Bandurski (班志远) was deleted from Sina Weibo sometime after 5:24pm Hong Kong time, Febuary 9, 2012. The post is a simple re-post, without comment, of an original Weibo post sharing an image of Hong Kong coverage of the Wang Lijun case. David Bandurski currently has more than 3,000 followers on Weibo. [More on deleted posts at the WeiboScope Search, by the Journalism and Media Studies Centre].
The image from the original post re-posted by David Bandurski follows. It shows a newspaper page from Hong Kong media with coverage of the case of Wang Lijun (王立军), the crime-busting official in the city of Chongqing whose own political fortunes are now in question, leading to speculation about internal wrangling within the Chinese Communist Party.


The large headline at the top reads: “Wang Lijun: I am Bo Xilai’s sacrificial lamb.” The headline on the second article reads: “Bo Xilai’s hard push to ‘sing red songs and strike against vice’ draws displeasure”. The headline running vertically along the right side of the paper reads: “The United States has no comment about Wang Lijun’s ‘vacation-style treatment'” The short headline to the left of the two photographs (with Bo and Wang on top) reads: “The two paths of Bo [Xilai] and Wang Yang [Guangdong’s top leader] are in struggle”. The headline at the bottom of the page reads: “The Chongqing Model breaks a leg, composition of 18th Party Congress in chaos.”

NOTE: All posts to The Anti-Social List are listed as “permission denied” in the Sina Weibo API, which means they were deleted by Weibo managers, not by users themselves.

Prominent academic on Wang Lijun case

The following re-post by veteran Chinese journalist and CMP director Qian Gang (钱钢) of an original post by Wu Jiaxiang (吴稼祥), a prominent Chinese academic, was deleted from Sina Weibo sometime after 5:57pm Hong Kong time, Febuary 9, 2012. The original Wu Jiaxiang post was also deleted by Sina Weibo. Qian Gang currently has more than 831,000 followers on Weibo, according to Sina’s numbers. Wu Jiaxiang has just under 185,000 followers. [More on deleted posts at the WeiboScope Search, by the Journalism and Media Studies Centre].
Here is a translation of the Wu Jiaxiang post re-posted by Qian Gang:

[The intelligent Wang Lijun] Actually, Wang’s misfortunes arrived back on May 12, 2011. On that day, his former partner, Gu Fengjie (谷凤杰), the head of the Public Security Bureau in Liaoning’s Tieling City, was detained pending an official investigation (两规). We can be quite sure that ever since that time, both Wang and Bo [Xilai] have been performing a song and dance duet. The latter [meaning Bo Xilai] knows only too well that this [investigation possibly implicating Wang] comes with evil intent, and he has wanted to cut off all connection with Wang [Lijun], knowing its best to let this continue in eternal silence. His going to the American consulate perhaps reflects his concern that the hand next to him [Bo Xilai’s] might fall more quickly than the hand of Beijing.

Wu Jiaxiang’s original post follows:

[聪明人王立军]其实,王的厄运从2011年5月12日降临,那一天,他以前的搭档,辽宁铁岭市公安局长谷凤杰被两规。可以肯定,从那时起,王和薄,就进入二人转大戏。后者知道,来者不善,想切断与王的所有联系,最好让其永远沉默。到美领事馆,大概是他担心,身边的手,比北京的手来得快。


NOTE: All posts to The Anti-Social List are listed as “permission denied” in the Sina Weibo API, which means they were deleted by Weibo managers, not by users themselves.