Author: David Bandurski

Now Executive Director of the China Media Project, leading the project’s research and partnerships, David originally joined the project in Hong Kong in 2004. He is the author of Dragons in Diamond Village (Penguin), a book of reportage about urbanization and social activism in China, and co-editor of Investigative Journalism in China (HKU Press).

Zhang Qianfan: making China's schools safer means building local democratic mechanisms

By David Bandurski — One of the most persistent issues to emerge in the aftermath of the Sichuan earthquake is of course the question of shoddy school construction. In a column running in The Beijing News just before the weekend, Peking University professor Zhang Qianfan (张千帆) argued that the building of local “democratic mechanisms” was necessary if China wished to avoid repetition of the tragedies of Wenchuan. [Homepage Image: Screenshot of Sohu.com coverage of rescue efforts at Juyuan Middle School in Sichuan on May 13, 2008.]

Local Democracy is the Basis for Rebuilding after the Disaster
By Zhang Qianfan (张千帆)
The recent Wenchuan quake resulted in massive injury and loss of life, including the death and injury of many students and teachers as their school buildings collapsed, something that has saddened our whole nation. After experiencing this massive earthquake . . . we cannot help but soberly consider the institutional causes of this phenomenon [of shoddy school construction], and how we might remedy these institutional problems as we go through the process of rebuilding. Only in this way can we avoid repeating the tragedies of Wenchuan.
The school buildings that collapsed in the disaster area were those of five-stories and higher, and most were pre-fabricated, in direct violation of the Primary and Secondary School Architectural Design Standards (中小学校建筑设计规范). While some government administrative buildings in the disaster area were similarly constructed, the vast majority were not, and this has invited controversy among Internet users. Officials from the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Housing (建设部) have publicly addressed the concerns expressed by Web users, and the Ministry of Housing has also asked that the Ministry of Education join it in conducting a joint inquiry. But while these are signs of definite progress, they are insufficient to address the problems exposed by the Wenchuan quake.
As one researcher from the China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center (中国地震灾害防御中心) has pointed out, “Earthquakes in and of themselves are not killers, rather it is the destruction of buildings that causes injury and loss of life.” If we explore this a bit deeper, we understand that while these collapses owe to quality issues, human beings built the buildings themselves. So why weren’t they built to national standards? And why is it that government buildings are of much higher quality than the school buildings?
The answers are not difficult to find. The reason is that a great deal more is spent on constructing government buildings than on constructing schools, so of course they are of higher quality and better able to resist earthquake damage. But where does the government’s money come from? Some of it comes from central government outlays, but the majority comes from taxes on ordinary local people. If we were to allow the local people to determine how to spend this money, what would they decide? Would they reserve more money for government buildings, or for the school buildings where their own children carry out their studies? There’s no sense in even answering this question – what family doesn’t care more for its own children?
So why are there so many school buildings of inferior quality? The answer is simply that ordinary people have not had any real say in how tax money is spent – this phenomenon cannot otherwise be explained. Governments and schools both are public entities sustained by tax revenues, and the structures that house them are built with appropriations determined by local governments. But because the specifics of appropriation are primarily determined by the government, it naturally follows that more building funds are budgeted for government buildings. The natural result is that schools face funding shortages, inferior quality and construction that falls short of national standards.
Why is it that local governments fail to implement national standards? Is it because supervision from the central and regional government is to no avail? The specific case in Wenchuan has already drawn attention from the central government and the whole nation, and the Ministry of Housing has already said it will conduct a thorough investigation. And perhaps we can hope that the central government will resolve the problem of school building quality in Wenchuan through direct intervention. But of course there is no conceivable way that the Ministry of Housing, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Supervision and other central government authorities can remain in Wenchuan for the long haul, fixing their eyes on local officials to ensure they abide by national construction standards. They have plenty of other priorities. Once they have made their exit, how are we to ensure that rebuilding in the earthquake zone is done with a mind to the basic interests of the people?
And across China, how many Wenchuans are there exactly? We cannot possibly expect the central government to keep its eye on every local official in order to ensure national regulations are followed. If we rely exclusively on the top-down supervision of the central government, well then, even if we do solve the problem of substandard school buildings in the area of Wenchuan, problems in other areas will remain. The tragedies of Wenchuan will be played out in some other place.
This being the case, how can we ensure that schools in other areas do not collapse? Essentially, this needs to happen through local democratic mechanisms making local officials answer truly to the local people. More specifically, ordinary people must either directly or indirectly participate in the government budgeting process so that expenditures become truly “public expenditures” rather than budgets made at the discretion of the local governments themselves.
In Zhejiang’s Wenling (温岭) and other areas, local governments have already begun conducting so-called “democratic consultations” (民主恳谈), budgetary hearings and other experiments to protect the rights of local constituencies to participate in the budgetary process. These are very valuable democratic experiments, and they deserve to be energetically pushed out into other areas.
Naturally, ordinary people do not necessarily have the time or the interest to directly participate in the political process, and this is why, in democratic nations, they generally entrust their own representatives to supervise government administration and make budgetary decisions. From the beginning, decisions about taxation and budgeting are passed by local congresses, and the role of local governments is simply to execute these budgets. This means of course that taxes won’t simply be channeled into the construction of government buildings.
Why would these representatives (代言人) of the people give more money for the building of schools? Because they are elected by the local people. Should their decisions contravene the interests of the local people, or jeopardize the safety of children, or should they squander the public’s money to build lavish offices or other pointless ventures, the people can in similar fashion vote them out. If the representatives of the people wish to be elected, and if they wish to remain elected, then they must act in the interest of the electorate, and they must exercise their authority to ensure that the whole government operates for the good of the people.
In 1982 China’s constitution stipulated that local people’s congresses and people’s congress delegates across the country had the authority to supervise the budgetary process. But due to numerous problems in the elective process for people’s congresses [IE, local party leaders controlling the selection process and/or serving on the congress], the stipulations of the constitution could not be actually be carried out. It is for this reason that we now see this phenomenon of luxurious government complexes contrasting with the frailty of school buildings . . . And therefore, to say that the Wenchuan earthquake exposes the frailty of a great number of rural school buildings is not as good as saying that it reveals the need to improve democratic mechanisms at the local level in China.
If we wish to ensure school buildings stand up in the midst of disaster just as government buildings do, the only way is to actually implement the elective systems (选举制度) mandated by our constitution. Reconstruction in the disaster area looms on the horizon, but what we need to rebuild first and foremost are local democratic mechanisms.
[Posted by David Bandurski, May 26, 2008, 6:35pm]

May 19 – May 25, 2008

May 19 – As China began three days of national mourning for the victims of Sichuan’s catastrophic Wenchuan earthquake, media across the country opted for black-and-white layouts. Major web portals temporarily suspended online entertainment activities, and online game services were stopped. In addition, online search services were suspended for entertainment content, including online entertainment videos (娱乐视频), and most online advertisements related to entertainment were temporarily pulled. [More from Danwei.org, “A Nation Mourns in Black and White.”]
May 23 – The Beijing News, one of China’s leading commercial newspapers, ran an editorial by Peking University professor Zhang Qianfan (张千帆) arguing that “local democracy is the root of rebuilding after the [earthquake] disaster.” Addressing the question of how China can avoid occurrences of local corruption such as that evidenced in the collapse of shoddily constructed school buildings, Zhang wrote that while the direct intervention of central authorities like the Ministry of Housing (MOHURD), Ministry of Education (MOE) and Ministry of Supervision (MOS) might be able to address the problem of local school construction in Sichuan, it cannot deal effectively with similar problems nationwide. “If we only apply the top-down supervision of central authorities,” Zhang wrote, “even if we resolve problems in Wenchuan, problems in other areas will go unaddressed, and when disasters come again in the future, we will only see the replay of Wenchuan’s tragedy elsewhere.” The solution, said Zhang, was to implement the elective system (选举制度) mandated by China’s constitution.
May 20 – In the latest example of so-called “online violence” in China, a teenager from Liaoning province became the target of Internet rage after a video appeared in which she launches into a sulky tirade showing little sympathy for earthquake victims in Sichuan province. Within hours of the video’s posting, Web users had reportedly tracked down the teenager’s telephone number, address and other personal information.

A Blogger's Ten Observations About the Post-Earthquake Mess

[From Roland Soong’s ESWN] Finally on the evening of May 16, I decided to watch the news program on Gansu TV in order to learn about the situation of the Wenchuan county earthquake. But I was disappointed with the results. The headline news story was about Gansu province party secretary Lu Ha consoling disaster victims in Wenyuan district while directing the disaster relief work. The video showed Party Secretary Lu looking as spirited, energetic and suave as always. He was neatly dressed, and he intentionally wore a pair of sunglasses. If you were not careful, you would have thought that this was a scene from the classical movie . After this first story, there came news stories about how the various provincial and city departments are seriously studying the spirit of the Central Political Bureau’s meeting and the various sectors of the province and cities are giving their love to the disaster area, and so on. Concerning the vital information about the damage in Wenyuan, the state of the earthquake relief work and the progress on the restoration of the Baocheng railroad line, there was not a single film shot. After the news program ended, the television serial drama followed. It did not look as if Gansu was the province which suffered the most damage from the earthquake right after Sichuan province . . . [Click here for the rest of the entry at ESWN].
[Posted by David Bandurski May 28, 2008, 10:10am]

Qian Gang: China's history of catastrophic 'quake lake' floods should be a warning to leaders

By David Bandurski — While the initial dangers of the Sichuan earthquake seem to have passed, the area continues to be rocked by aftershocks, landslides and mud and rock flows that endanger survivors and rescue workers. In his latest column on the Wenchuan quake, CMP director Qian Gang re-visits the Diexi earthquake of 1933 and the lessons it holds for today.

“’Bursting ‘earthquake lakes’ send us a warning through history
Qian Gang (钱钢)
A magnitude 8.0 earthquake, powerful aftershocks and massive landslides and mud and rock flows superimposed on one another have made the Wenchuan earthquake extremely destructive. Many rivers have been obstructed, resulting in at least 21 barrier lakes in the area. These lakes are large and their water levels high. In some areas, destroyed homes have already been submerged. Disaster relief headquarters has already ordered a thorough investigation of these barrier lakes. The Ministry of Water Resources, armed hydroelectric police units and experts organized by the Sichuan provincial government are closely watching the situation.
The largest barrier lake collapse in China in the last century had cataclysmic results. Well-known Chinese earthquake forecasting expert Geng Qingguo (耿庆国) observed the disaster scene at that time first-hand, and he wrote about it in “The Collapse of ‘Earthquake Lakes’: The 1933 Diexi Earthquake” (published in the book One-hundred Major Disasters in 20th Century China/二十世纪中国重灾百录).

quake-lake.jpg

[ABOVE: Image of remains of the Diexi barrier lake, from the Science Museums of China website.]

Notice the name of this place – Diexi. Diexi is a town in Sichuan’s Mao County (茂县), and it falls within the area of today’s major quake. At 3:50 pm on August 25, 1933, a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Diexi, with an epicentral intensity of X. The town of Diexi was entirely destroyed. As is the case in Wenchuan, the Diexi quake brought massive landslides at three points in Diexi, obstructing the Minjiang River (岷江). Eleven days after the earthquake a lake had appeared high up in the gorge. The water in the lake stretched back more than 12 kilometers, and at its widest point it was two kilometers across. It had become a major lake.
45 days after the quake, at 7pm on October 9, 1933, powerful aftershocks burst the barrier lake. The water gushed forth from the lake, tearing away the steep slopes on either shore and sending towering floodwaters rushing down the valley.
Geng Qingguo leaves us the following startling account:
“The waters gushed forth at 7pm, reaching Mao County by 9pm, Weizhou (威旧) by 11pm, reaching Wenchuan (汶川) by midnight and Guan County (灌县) by early the next day . . . “
These historical records reveal that the Wenchuan earthquake region of today was in fact in the past wiped out by the catastrophic bursting of a barrier lake caused by a quake. And the bursting of that barrier lake 75 years ago reminds us of the immense secondary dangers posed by earthquakes. In the Diexi earthquake itself, an estimated 7,000 lives were lost, but in the secondary bursting of the barrier lake 20,000 people died. 4,000 corpses alone were pulled out of Dujiangyan.
The aftershocks of today’s Sichuan earthquake have not yet ceased, landslides and mud and rock flows are still occurring, and precipitation is still building. Those 20 or so barrier lakes are ticking time bombs. I hope engineering experts conduct further inspections in order to fully understand the potential dangers, and take effective measures, diverting water and ensuring the safety of survivors and rescue workers in the disaster area.
I once worked at the China Earthquake Administration’s China Disaster Reduction Press. The editor in chief was Geng Qingguo. He is a scientist who has devoted his life to the study of earthquake prediction, and in The Great Tangshan Earthquake I make many references to his work. After the Wenchuan quake occurred, I recalled that when I was working together with Mr. Geng, I often heard him talking with other earthquake experts about a place called “Maowen” (茂汶). This, in fact, was Mao County and Wenchuan. In 1958 they were merged into the Maowen Qiang Autonomous County (茂汶羌族自治县). This is an area earthquake specialists in China have long paid attention to.
Probing deeply into this massive earthquake will be the work of many days. At present, relief work goes ahead under precipitous circumstances, as the barrier lakes are raised like swords overhead. By recalling the historical facts of the Diexi quake, I want only to encourage those leading the relief effort to be watchful!
[Posted By David Bandurski, May 23, 2008, 1:47pm]

FURTHER READING:
Rains threaten China quake lake disaster“, Reuters, May 23, 2008
Rain forecast for SW China, adding to ‘quake lake’ risks“, People’s Daily, May 22, 2008

Qian Gang: the war against disease in the disaster area has already begun

By David Bandurski — As the hope of finding survivors in the rubble of the Sichuan earthquake grows dim, the focus of the relief effort is turning toward the needs and conditions of the close to five million people left homeless by the disaster. Disease prevention is a key priority. In his latest editorial on the quake, CMP director Qian Gang talks about the urgency and enormity of disease prevention efforts on the ground in Sichuan.

The Decisive Battle Against Disease in the Quake Area Has Begun!
By Qian Gang (钱钢)
The most important matter now facing the disaster area [in Sichuan province] is disease prevention. Temperatures are rising by the day, and many bodies of the lost have yet to be recovered from the rubble. Threats to the well being of quake survivors and relief workers are on the rise.
32 years ago, when I entered Tangshan as a member of the disease prevention team, I witnessed abysmal living conditions in the disaster area. Tangshan and the Sichuan quake are similar in the sense that the lifelines for cities and towns — things like electricity and water – have been completely wiped away, and poor sanitation and lack of drinking water are major problems. Mechanisms for removing human waste, polluted water and other garbage have all been totally paralyzed. Medical and disease prevention systems have been seriously impacted. After Tangshan, the bodies of 240,000 victims had to be disposed of. Disease did not break out, but this was a miraculous stroke of luck.
But there are several things that make the battle against disease today different from the situation following the Tangshan quake.
For starters, the area encompassed by the disaster [in Sichuan] is many times larger than that of the Tangshan earthquake, and severely damaged towns and cities are spread throughout the area. The upshot of this is that the battle lines in the fight against disease are incredibly long. In the city and countryside, there are vast numbers of corpses of domesticated animals in addition to human bodies. As areas are cut off from the power grid and large-scale cooling facilities either destroyed or out of operation, a great mass of other items is now rotting as well. The amount of daily garbage now rotting out in the open is truly staggering. All of this distinguishes the present situation from what we saw back in Tangshan, in a time when goods were scarce. Disease prevention will be a major undertaking. The current strategy from the [earthquake relief] command headquarters, in which disease prevention teams from various provinces spread out and cover particular counties [in the disaster area], is correct, but what we don’t know is whether these disease prevention teams are sufficient.
The task of clearing bodies from the rubble is more difficult than for Tangshan. The collapsed structures in the Sichuan quake area, with their steel-reinforced concrete, far surpass the scale of Tangshan. That is to say, rescue workers will have to work through a mass of complex and intricate collapsed structures in order to find survivors and clear out bodies. In the coming few days, this work will go ahead under increasingly tough conditions. In the end, I’m afraid there may be many bodies that cannot be retrieved.
The management of disease prevention is more complex than it was for Tangshan. 32 years ago, in the final days of the Cultural Revolution, the disaster area was managed almost like a militarization. In today’s disaster area, it is much harder to handle things as they were handled in Tangshan, when corpses were gathered and buried expediently. In this quake, the government has given consideration to the feelings of the bereaved in formulating procedures for the handling of corpses. The government has designated a procedure for the claiming of bodies, even allowing the laying out of corpses prior to cremation. Some relatives of the dead have resisted the idea of mass burial, which has added a new level of difficulty to handling the situation.
This time, the rescue workers, news reporters and volunteers in the disaster area are also far more diverse than was the case for Tangshan. There is the potential for inadequacies in the handling of personal hygiene and protection. Journalists on the front lines tell me that their own disease protection and sterilization is being handled by volunteers. While this is an effective method, I hope it can be extended to everyone.
As we see on television, ordinary people in the county-level city of Wenchuan are now using cardboard to shield themselves from the sun. The temperature in the disaster area has already reached 30 degrees Celsius and is steadily going up. In the two weeks following the Tangshan earthquake the temperature quickly dropped, exactly the opposite situation. A crisis in the handling of bodies in the Sichuan earthquake region is already imminent . . .
In Tangshan, many bodies were not buried deep enough, and toward the end of the year, the Ministry of Health issued an order for mass exhumation and reburying. In Sichuan, if the same thing happens in the hot summer just around the corner, the ramifications are hard to even imagine.
The war against disease has already begun. The leaders of the relief effort are taking decisive measures, cordoning off areas of rubble where contamination is severe and arranging for temporary quarters for disaster victims further away from the rubble. Here, I want to offer my deepest respect to those brave soldiers doing the difficult work of removing bodies!

[Posted by David Bandurski, May 22, 2008, 12:03pm]

Should China set up an interim authority to ensure earthquake donations are used fairly?

By David Bandurski — Over the past week in China there has been an outpouring of support for victims of the Sichuan earthquake. Donation drives around the country have drawn in millions upon millions of yuan for the relief effort. But in a country where institutional corruption is a perennial headache, how can Chinese citizens who have opened their hearts and their wallets for the victims of this disaster ensure that relief donations reach those who need them?
In a recent article, columnist Lao Dan (老蛋) said this was a question not just about accountability, but about the dignity of the Chinese people. Lao called for the creation of a special authority to oversee the use of donations and make regular reports to the Chinese public.
“We have a responsibility to demand that the government establish an interim authority to conduct a transparent and effective audit of donations,” he wrote.
Portions of the article follow.
On this issue, we also recommend that readers check out CMP’s case study on the Project Hope corruption case, reported by CMP fellow Zhai Minglei (翟明磊).

Aside from Giving Donations, There is Something Important Required of Us
By Lao Dan (老蛋)
In recent days, countless Chinese have devoted great love in the face of disaster, and countless tears have washed our inner hearts. And still, all of our words and donations cannot remedy the sadness and hurt of those disaster victims who have lost their loved ones. All of our angst and toil cannot bring back the precious lives of loved ones lost.
Everyone is asking within him or herself, how can I do my part for this disaster? . . .
The vast majority of people have decided to donate money, and this is the best and most direct method. For days now an ever-rising amount of donations has served to sooth the hearts of people across the nation.
However, there is one other thing we need to do . . . For the disaster area, for those brothers and sisters who have lost their children, for those brothers and sisters who have lost their parents and relatives . . . we have a responsibility to demand that these donated funds are dispensed under effective supervision by relevant government authorities in order to ensure that they are actually used for disaster victims, in order to ensure that they can really help disaster victims rebuild their homes, and to ensure that the Chinese people are not deprived of their dignity in the face of this massive disaster.
We have a responsibility to demand that the government establish an interim authority to conduct a transparent and effective audit of donations, and make regular reports to the public via the media and the Internet. We must know that the work of rebuilding after this disaster will not happen overnight, that we have a long road of disaster relief ahead of us . . .
So, as we all face this disaster together, we have a personal responsibility to call on and supervise government units using donated funds to ensure that they are used transparently. The state has a responsibility to empower relevant offices to supervise the use [of funds]. And those units distributing and using the donated funds have a responsibility to put the people of the nation at ease, knowing that the funds they donated to fundraising efforts are used for disaster relief . . .

[Posted by David Bandurski, May 21, 2008, 5:35pm HK]

May 5 – May 11, 2008

May 7 – According to a report from Hong Kong’s Ming Pao Daily, Nandu Weekly chief editor Zhang Ping (张平) was removed from his position following a controversy surrounding an editorial that appeared on his personal Weblog and in the Chinese language online edition of the Financial Times. The editorial, “Tibet: the truth and nationalist sentiment,” took a moderate view on March protests in Tibet. It drew harsh and personal attacks from Internet users, who accused Zhang, who writes under the penname Chang Ping (长平), and Southern Metropolis Daily (publisher of Nandu Weekly) of betraying the Chinese nation. The facts behind Zhang Ping’s removal as an editor at Nandu Weekly remain unclear, but the decision seems to have been made internally at Southern Metropolis Daily to offset pressure against the paper. Contacted by CMP, top editor at the newspaper refused to discuss Zhang’s case, an understandable decision since the veteran journalist continues to be an active writer – there is no need, in their view, to jeopardize Zhang’s career any further by making him the focus of more attention on this issue.
May 8 – A series of editorials in major newspapers attacked top party leaders in the prefectural-level city of Fuyang (阜阳), Anhui province, as a spate continued over a series of questionable cases throwing attention on the city. The cases included the suspicious “suicide” of Li Guofu, a local real-estate executive who blew the whistle on local corruption, including the misappropriation of funds for the construction of a lavish local government building called the “white house”. This scandal was shortly followed by new of a local outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease that had been covered up by officials for weeks. Local party leaders called the rash of reports an attempt to“demonize Fuyang.” In a May 8 editorial called “Who Demonized Fuyang?”, the Yangtze Evening News accused leaders in Fuyang of attempting to throw off their own responsibility by pitting the pride of the people of Fuyang against national media. An editorial in The Beijing News from Jiangxi prosecutor Yang Tao (杨涛) said the investigation into the death of Li Guofu should not exclude the media. Rather, he argued, regular press conferences could help dispel public doubts about the fairness of the process, and, moreover, facts gathered in the original China Youth Daily report on Li’s death showed that investigators should maintain close contact with news media.

Facing crisis, one of Sichuan's top commercial tabloids returns briefly to its party-paper roots

By David Bandurski — On the morning of May 12, just hours before the disastrous magnitude 7.9 earthquake struck Sichuan, many readers in the provincial capital of Chengdu would have been poring through the latest edition of Huaxi Metropolis Daily (华西都市报), one of the region’s leading commercial newspapers (which, in fact, broke the Henan Aids epidemic story back in 1999). And the paper would have offered its characteristically dynamic look into city life, in marked contrast to its stiff and stodgy party counterpart, Sichuan Daily.
Sure, the main story that morning leaned a bit toward the party boilerplate — a Xinhua News Agency piece about China’s launch of its own domestic commercial jet manufacturer. Sure, there was an editorial off to the right from Sichuan Daily, blathering on about the party slogan “emancipation of minds” (思想大解放).
But there was plenty else to induce the discerning reader to pluck the paper off the newsstand.

huaxi-dushibao-51208-day-of-quake.jpg

[ABOVE: Front page of the May 12 edition of Sichuan’s Huaxi Metropolis Daily.]

At center was a teaser for a juicy human interest story about a local woman who suddenly went into labor while she was in the car. There were two color photos to tug on the heartstrings, the first of the swaddled newborn, the second of happy new parents (a pair of Mother’s Day stories).
Tags pointed readers to other exciting content inside — coverage of the Cannes Film Festival, where the paper had posted a correspondent, analysis of China’s ping-pong hopes in the upcoming Olympic Games, and a story about a policeman in Chongqing who died of exhaustion at his desk.
Four days later, after the devastation wrought by the Wenchuan earthquake, Huaxi Metropolis Daily looked like a different newspaper altogether.

huaxi-dushibao-may-16-2008-frontpage.jpg

[ABOVE: Front page of the May 16 edition of Sichuan’s Huaxi Metropolis Daily.]

The difference was not merely that all of the front page news dealt with the earthquake and its impact on the area. That was understandable.
But in its layout the paper had made a sudden return to the habits of its party-paper ancestors. There was no longer any material difference with the layout of the wooden Sichuan Daily, save tiny advertisements for Sanyo and China Mobile, and the welcome respite of a right-hand sidebar.

sichuan-daily-may-16-2008-frontpage.jpg

[ABOVE: Front page of the May 16 edition of Sichuan’s Sichuan Daily.]

There were other important changes too. The space just to the side of the newspaper’s masthead, generally a photo-accompanied teaser for reader-relevant inside coverage, had been scrapped for a Sichuan Daily release about how Sichuan Party Secretary Liu Qibao (刘奇葆) and vice-secretary Jiang Jufeng (蒋巨峰) had “taken the lead in contributing funds” for the relief effort.
All of the coverage on the front page of Huaxi Metropolis Daily was either from the official Xinhua News Agency or from the province’s party mouthpiece, Sichuan Daily.
The lead photograph — indeed, the only large photograph — was of top provincial officials, a clear throwback to the party-paper rule book.
This, of course, is not what we have come to expect from China’s new brand of commercial newspapers.
Since commercial newspapers emerged in China in the mid-to-late 1990s, their coverage has been increasingly distinct from that of the party newspapers, or dangbao (党报), which have persisted in the party news style, a stiff recounting of the actions and decisions of party and government leaders. While party papers have remained true to the media’s historic “mouthpiece” (喉舌) role under the CCP, commercial newspapers have, “propaganda discipline” notwithstanding, offered much more diverse content and a livelier look and feel.
Here’s the front page from the May 17 edition of Shanghai’s Oriental Morning Post, more of what we’ve come to expect from commercially-oriented papers.

oriental-morning-post-may-17-08.jpg

For a more thorough look at differences in coverage between party and commercial newspapers, we point readers to CMP’s 2006 case on the corruption scandal involving Beijing mayor Liu Zhihua.
It’s tough to say right now what the reasons are behind Huaxi Metropolis Daily‘s party-retro makeover, or why it seems to have occurred on May 16 (the previous three editions show the paper in reasonably commercial form).
While we know that China’s attitude in handling the disaster has so far been refreshingly open, it is conceivable — though this is purely speculation at this point — that Sichuan’s top party leaders have utilized (not necessarily with the worst of intentions, mind you) local commercial newspapers in order to take advantage of their vastly greater circulations.
Since the 1990s, the circulations of party newspapers throughout China have steadily dropped, and Sichuan’s officialSichuan Daily is no exception. This has presented something of a dilemma for party leaders hoping to get their own messages out to the public.
Of course, we do need to keep in mind that Huaxi Metropolis Daily has dispatched its own reporters to those areas most affected by the quake. An announcement in Friday’s edition, in fact, mentions that the paper has sent out an additional 13 reporters.
And today’s edition, which features an arresting black-and-white photograph of a child’s hand emerging from the rubble, seems to be a return to form for Huaxi Metropolis Daily, even as much of the front-page content remains Xinhua News Agency stuff.
Were the May 16-18 editions design hiccups? Nods to the provincial leadership? For now, we will leave the question open.
Meanwhile, we offer the following front-page images from Huaxi Metropolis Daily, in consecutive order from May 8 to May 19.
Readers may note that the space to the right of the masthead has been used consistently for content since the earthquake struck, a party-paper throwback. Content in this spot is as follows:

May 13 — a teaser from a report from Huaxi’s own reporter
May 14 — official news about top national leaders
May 15 — official news about top national leaders
May 16 — official news from Sichuan Daily about top Sichuan provincial leaders
May 17 — official notice from provincial leaders reported more or less verbatim by one of Huaxi‘s own reporters
May 18 — Xinhua News Agency release about top national leaders

huaxi-may-8-edition.jpg

huaxi-may-9-08.jpg

huaxi-may-10-08.jpg

huaxi-may-11-08.jpg

huaxi-dushibao-51208-day-of-quake.jpg

huaxi-may-13-edition.jpg

huaxi-may-14-edition.jpg

huaxi-may-15-edition.jpg

huaxi-dushibao-may-16-2008-frontpage.jpg

huaxi-may-17-edition.jpg

huaxi-may-18-edition.jpg

huaxi-may-19-edition.jpg

[Posted by David Bandurski, May 19, 2008, 12:45pm HK]

Qian Gang: as we wait for miracle quake survivors, let's not lose sight of the tasks at hand

By David Bandurski — As the rescue effort in Sichuan enters its seventh crucial day, Chinese and foreign media continue to report the story with intensity. One major focus of coverage, and the story all viewers are waiting for, is the tale of miraculous survival. But in his latest commentary on the Wenchuan quake, CMP director Qian Gang cautions media — and the rest of us — not to lose sight of what is most important: life.
Qian Gang’s editorial, which appears in today’s edition of Southern Metropolis Daily, follows in full.

The Last Push, For Lives Not for Miracles
By Qian Gang (钱钢)
Today is now the seventh day after a massive earthquake struck Wenzhou. The rescue teams are turning their efforts to saving the last lives they can. People across the nation are watching. How many survivors are still left among the wreckage? And can they hold on long enough for the crews to reach them?
These seven days, with their constant aftershocks, lack food and water, unattended injuries and collapsing spirits, have already taken many lives in the darkness. On this seventh day, the chances of survival among the wreckage are small and diminishing. But people cannot give up, no matter how fragile are the hopes. They must put in all the effort they can for those fortunate enough to have survived.
It is entirely possible that people like this exist. After the earthquake struck, while they were pinned within deep pockets, they may not have been mortally injured. Some might have found water, some might have found food, and some might have extraordinary stamina.
After the Great Tangshan Earthquake, Wang Shubin (王树斌), a coal miner in Kailuan, ate the buckwheat husks and chaff from his sleeping pillow, and he survived for eight days. Another who survived for eight days, a nurse named Wang Zilan (王子兰), was incredibly lively [when she finally emerged], and said she that amidst the darkness she had constantly wound her watch in the firm belief she would be rescued. Then there was 46 year-old Lu Guilan (卢桂兰), who survived in the rubble for 13 days, without a morsel of food or a drop of water. He stayed alive by drinking his own urine, and when he was found, though he could not move his limbs, he woke and shouted, “Long live the People’s Liberation Army!”
All of these are called “miracles.” And we can believe that these kinds of miracles will happen again in Sichuan’s earthquake zone. But as the final push begins, I want to offer a good-natured reminder: What is most important?
Lives. Of course, lives. Do people not know? It is in the thirst for life that people seek to create miracles and witness miracles. But we should recognize the fact that when the search for survivors becomes a lofty pursuit, and we begin using this word “miracle”, the rubble of the disaster area becomes an area of particular dramatic focus.
It becomes the goal that rescuers on the ground want to spare no expense in reaching, and it becomes the focus of news media who crave news results (新闻效果). Countless cameras are poised for that one instant, to capture moments of human emotion. This is not exactly reprehensible, but considering first the lives of survivors, I’d like to express a couple of my concerns.
At this crucial time, the areas where the search for survivors goes on must be totally quiet. After Tangshan, some of the miracle survivors were found in the dead of night by “listening” teams (潜听队). In the event that a survivor is found, the whole process of removing the rubble and rescuing them is extremely delicate. This can go on for a long time as water and food are conveyed, intravenous fluids are administered, or even surgery conducted. All of these require that the experts are given a decent environment in which to work, so they can calmly and delicately go about their business. Of those survivors rescued in Tangshan, only Wang Shubin was filmed for a documentary feature. And at that time there was no such thing as live television.
We must also face the facts of the disaster area head on. As locating survivors is given top priority, other aspects of relief that are equally serious and urgent, but beyond the glare of the spotlight, cannot be overlooked. The lightly and seriously injured, the aged and the young, they have escaped the grasp of death, but they are injured and in pain, and under the threat of poor sanitation and other secondary effects, they remain extremely vulnerable. Deployment [of personnel] must quickly be reorganized — handling the bodies of the dead will become the key focus of work on the ground.
We are all waiting for the miracle of life. But “life” is more important than “miracles”. Life is more important than the glory or success of any profession [i.e., journalism].
For life, and not for miracles, let us with purer hearts struggle on together!

[Posted by David Bandurski, May 18, 2008, 1:43pm HK]

What does the Olympic torch relay mean in the aftermath of the Sichuan quake?

By David Bandurski — As rescue and relief work goes ahead in Sichuan province, one topic of secondary interest in China’s editorial pages has been the fate of the Olympic torch relay. We pointed yesterday to a Caijing editorial earlier this week advising leaders to postpone the torch relay until disaster work had stabilized, then arrange for the torch to go directly from the quake’s epicenter at Wenchuan to Beijing.
In an editorial in Southern Metropolis Daily yesterday, scholar Wu Zuolai (吴祚来) called on leaders to send the Olympic torch directly to Wenchuan, without delay, so that it can “shine on those who need rescue and relief.”
In answer to Wu’s emotive appeal, journalist Ye Zi (叶子), editor of China Elections and Governance, suggests today in Southern Metropolis Daily’s “Responses and Criticisms” section that Wu’s idea is callous and untimely.
The pair of editorials follow, in order of their appearance.

Let the Olympic flame go directly to Wenchuan!
By Wu Zuolai (吴祚来)
May 16, 2008
The Olympic torch does not have symbolic meaning, regardless of where it goes, and people cannot get the proper measure of joy from its arrival because major disaster still grates on our brothers and sisters.
The Olympic torch should go be carried directly to Wenchuan.
Let the Olympic flame shine on those who need rescue and relief. Let the world see their tragedy and their resilience. Let the Olympic flame shine on the rescue workers. Let the world see their courage and goodness. Let the Olympic flame shine on the wreckage of homes and cities. Let all good-willed people wish the best for those living in the midst of disaster.
The Olympic flame should be immediately carried to Wenchuan, traveling with the aid vehicles, moving amongst those who seek their loved ones. Let it give the hope of life to those in darkness. Let it give relief to those who have been rescued. Let it give strength to the rescue teams. It will draw the loving attention of the whole world, and stand as a sublime symbol for the Chinese people.
[We’ve removed several paragraphs of lofty, sentimental language.]
Let the Olympic flame go directly to Wenchuan!
Let the sacred flame go directly to Wenchuan!
Because the torch carries with it universal values. Because the Olympic flame represents warmth and piece. Because the Olympic flame moves always with love, a call for prosperity . . .
Let the Olympic flame go directly to Wenchuan!
We call for the loving hearts of the whole world to go directly to Wenchuan!
_____________
Faced with disaster, what need do we have for ‘symbols’?
By Ye Zi (叶子)
May 17, 2008
On May 16, I read Mr. Wu Zuolai’s column in Southern Metropolis Daily, “Let the Olympic flame go directly to Wenchuan!” I was truly astonished. I have one question I would like to ask Mr. Wu: faced with present disaster, when all that matters is human life, what need to we really have for “symbols”?
Since [the quake struck on] May 12, I’m sure a lot of people who like me rarely watch the nightly newscast on CCTV are now glued to the screen. Our feelings at this time are of concern, concern for progress in the relief effort, concern about the weather and other snags. As life hangs in the balance our hearts are clenched. And when the CCTV newscast reported on the Olympic torch relay, I felt awkward. I wasn’t sure what my heart should make of such a grand affair.
I felt just as embarrassed when those people who turned out for the torch relay, after a moment of silence, turned their shiny faces to the world, their beaming faces full of passion and hope. Anyone would agree, I think, that this was cruel.
I understand that the Olympic torch relay cannot be stopped. But I really hope that in these days after May 12 we can refrain from all of this face-painting, and that we can avoid all of this empty formalism in the torch relay. There is even no need to have torchbearers all wearing the same uniforms . . .
Not everyone understands us when we talk about “values,” about the difference between “Chinese characteristics” and “universal [values]”. Not everyone has read [Donne’s] “No man is an island . . . And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls.” . . .
At this time, the world is already focused on Wenchuan. But Wenchuan is not a play stage (秀场). What Wenchuan needs is a wholehearted rescue and relief effort. What it needs is a race with death. What it needs is homes for those who have no homes. I have experienced the pain of the loss of a family member. If, as my loved one’s were fighting against death or had just passed away, you were to talk to me about the meaning of life and the symbol of the pine [representing immortality], that would be exceptionally bad timing.

[Posted by David Bandurski, May 17, 2008, 1:25pm HK]